Despite the transformative potential of Generative AI, adoption within legal departments remains low. Many legal teams are stuck at the proof of concept (PoC) stage, reluctant to scale due to perceived risks and challenges. However, a significant majority recognise the urgent need to move forward with their AI initiatives over the next two to three years. This urgency stems from the clear benefits that AI offers in terms of improving efficiency, accuracy and decision-making. To successfully navigate this transition, legal departments must adopt a strategic approach that addresses key considerations such as user adoption, cost-benefit analysis, regulatory compliance, and change management. This article explores the essential steps for scaling beyond PoC and fully integrating Generative AI into legal operations. 

Understanding the transition - from PoC to full implementation 

The journey from PoC to full-scale implementation of Generative AI in legal departments is both exciting and challenging. During the PoC phase, legal teams often experiment with AI tools on a small scale to assess their potential. While this phase is critical for understanding capabilities, it often falls short of demonstrating the full range of benefits that AI can offer when integrated into day-to-day operations. 

One of the main barriers to scaling is reluctance rooted in uncertainty - uncertainty about the reliability of AI, the cost of implementation and the disruption it might cause to existing workflows. However, staying in the PoC phase limits the ability to realise the full potential of AI. Moving to full implementation requires a strategic shift that focuses on broader user adoption, comprehensive training, and robust support systems. 

Legal departments need to develop a clear roadmap that outlines the steps for scaling AI. This includes identifying high-impact areas where AI can add significant value, such as contracts, compliance monitoring, and deep-dive analytics. By focusing on these areas, legal teams can achieve quick wins that demonstrate ROI and build momentum for broader AI adoption. In addition, engaging stakeholders at all levels and fostering a culture of innovation is critical to overcoming resistance and ensuring a smooth transition from PoC to full implementation. 

Driving user adoption 

User adoption is critical to the successful implementation of Generative AI in legal departments. Without buy-in from the legal team, even the most advanced AI solutions can fail to deliver their full potential. To drive user adoption, it is essential to focus on comprehensive training and ongoing support. Legal professionals need to understand how AI can enhance their work, making tasks more efficient and allowing them to focus on higher value activities. 

Effective training programmes should be tailored to different roles within the legal team, demonstrating practical applications and addressing specific concerns. In addition, ongoing support from AI champions or dedicated support staff can help users overcome challenges and build confidence in using new tools. 

Addressing common fears and misconceptions about AI is also critical. Many legal professionals worry that AI will replace their jobs or make critical mistakes. By emphasising AI's role as a complementary tool rather than a replacement, and demonstrating its ability to improve accuracy and efficiency, legal departments can allay these concerns and foster a more positive attitude towards AI adoption. 

Realising benefits versus costs 

A thorough cost-benefit analysis is essential to understanding the value of Generative AI for legal departments. While the initial investment in AI technology can be significant, the long-term benefits often outweigh these costs. AI can significantly reduce the time spent on routine tasks such as document review, legal research and compliance monitoring, resulting in significant cost savings. 

Case studies of organisations that have successfully implemented AI show impressive returns on investment. These include reduced legal processing times, improved accuracy in document handling and enhanced decision-making capabilities. In addition, AI can help legal departments handle increased workloads without a proportional increase in staff, providing scalability and flexibility. 

Balancing upfront costs with long-term benefits means looking beyond immediate financial metrics. Consider the broader impact on productivity, employee satisfaction and client service. By framing the investment in terms of strategic value and competitive advantage, legal departments can build a compelling case for AI adoption. 

Considering long-term and regulatory implications 

As legal departments scale Generative AI solutions, it's important to navigate the complex regulatory landscape. Ensuring compliance with data protection laws, such as GDPR and the AI Act, is critical. Legal teams must implement robust data governance frameworks to protect sensitive information and maintain client confidentiality. 

In addition, it is essential to stay abreast of potential future regulatory changes. Proactively addressing these considerations can mitigate legal risks and enhance the department's reputation for compliance and ethical use of AI. By prioritising long-term regulatory implications, legal departments can build a sustainable AI strategy that aligns with evolving legal standards and public expectations. 

Managing change - how to accept less than 100% accuracy? 

The transition to Generative AI requires legal departments to accept that AI tools, while powerful, are not infallible. Unlike traditional methods, AI solutions may not achieve 100% accuracy, especially in complex legal scenarios. It is crucial to set realistic expectations and develop a mindset that values the augmentative capabilities of AI, rather than expecting perfection. 

Change management plays a key role in this transition. Legal teams should be prepared for an initial learning curve and occasional errors. Implementing robust review processes and human oversight can mitigate the impact of inaccuracies. Training programmes should emphasise the collaborative nature of AI, where human expertise complements AI-driven insights. 

Creating a culture that embraces experimentation and learning from mistakes will help legal professionals adapt more easily. By focusing on continuous improvement and using AI to enhance, rather than replace, human judgement, legal departments can effectively integrate AI into their workflows and achieve better outcomes overall. 

Avoiding bureaucratic processes and solutions 

One of the biggest barriers to scaling Generative AI in legal departments is the tendency to over-complicate processes with bureaucratic hurdles. To realise the full potential of AI, it is essential to streamline implementation processes and foster an agile, innovative culture. 

First, simplify decision-making processes. Establish clear governance structures that enable rapid decision-making and reduce the number of layers of approval required. This will ensure that AI projects can move forward without unnecessary delays. Empower cross-functional teams with the authority to make decisions quickly, fostering a sense of ownership and accountability. 

Second, adopt agile methodologies. Agile practices, such as iterative development and continuous feedback loops, allow legal departments to quickly adapt to change and incorporate improvements. This flexibility is critical in the fast-moving field of AI, where new advances and regulations emerge frequently. 

Third, prioritise practical solutions over perfection. Rather than striving for a flawless AI implementation from the outset, focus on deploying minimally viable solutions that can deliver immediate value. These solutions can be refined over time based on real-world feedback and performance data. This approach not only speeds up the implementation process, but also allows legal teams to demonstrate quick wins, building trust and support for further AI initiatives. 

Finally, foster a culture of innovation and experimentation. Encourage team members to propose and test new ideas, and reward creativity and calculated risk-taking. By creating an environment where experimentation is valued and failure is seen as a learning opportunity, legal departments can accelerate AI adoption and continually improve their AI strategies. 

Mitigating technology concentration risk 

Over-reliance on a single AI vendor for multiple solutions can pose significant risks to a legal department's overall IT architecture. If a key vendor experiences an outage or disruption, it can severely impact operational capabilities, causing delays and potential legal ramifications. To mitigate this risk, it's important to strike the right balance between buying off-the-shelf solutions and building custom AI tools in-house. 

Diversifying technology providers ensures that the legal department is not overly reliant on a single source, reducing vulnerability to vendor-specific issues. This approach involves evaluating and integrating AI tools from multiple vendors, spreading risk and increasing resilience. 

It is also important to balance the buy and build strategy. While buying AI solutions can provide rapid deployment and immediate benefits, building bespoke tools in-house allows for customisation and greater control over functionality. However, building in-house solutions can be resource-intensive and costly. Therefore, a hybrid approach that combines both strategies can optimise cost effectiveness and flexibility. 

Regularly reviewing and updating the AI portfolio is also critical. This ensures that the department remains at the forefront of technological advances and compliance with evolving standards. By taking a diversified and proactive approach, legal departments can guard against technology concentration risks and ensure robust and resilient AI integration into their operations. 

Achieving success - measuring ROI 

Measuring the return on investment (ROI) of Generative AI in legal departments is critical to demonstrating value and guiding future initiatives. Key performance indicators (KPIs) should be established to track both quantitative and qualitative benefits. 

Quantitative metrics can include time saved on routine tasks, cost reductions and improvements in document review accuracy. These tangible benefits can be directly linked to financial savings and efficiency gains. In addition, tracking the volume of work handled without a proportional increase in staff provides insight into scalability and capacity improvements. 

Qualitative metrics are just as important. Evaluate user satisfaction, client feedback and the overall impact on decision quality. Collect regular feedback from legal professionals to understand their experience and identify areas for improvement. 

Continuous improvement and feedback loops are essential. By regularly reviewing KPIs and adjusting strategies based on performance data, legal departments can ensure that AI initiatives remain aligned with organisational goals and deliver sustainable value over time. 

Final thoughts

Scaling Generative AI beyond the proof-of-concept phase presents both opportunities and challenges for legal departments. By focusing on strategic user adoption, thorough cost-benefit analysis, and consideration of long-term regulatory implications, legal teams can realise the full potential of AI. Adopting change management practices and accepting the inherent limitations of AI will foster a collaborative environment where AI tools complement human expertise. 

Streamlining processes to avoid bureaucracy, and mitigating technology concentration risks through diversification, are critical steps in building a resilient AI strategy. Measuring ROI with both quantitative and qualitative metrics ensures that AI initiatives deliver tangible value and continuous improvement. 

By adopting a strategic and agile approach, legal departments can navigate the complexities of AI implementation and ultimately achieve greater efficiency, accuracy and innovation in their operations. 

Content from the Deloitte Legal blog can now be sent direct to your inbox. Choose the topic and frequency by subscribing here.